Media Technologies, Cognition And Consciousness-Expansion

What are some of the way in which technology changes us? Aside from being a technological determinist there are many way to think about the growing evolution of us, the environment and of course… the machine.

The following is an abstract for a thesis examining what potential links lay between the human and technology.

Abstract (Media-Technologies-Cognition-and-Consciousness-Expansion)

Our attitudes towards and relationship with technology is increasingly becoming a ground for debate as to the positive or negative effects upon society. The development of newer forms of media communication technologies are continually redefining the ways in which we interact and participate in symbolic systems.

This Honours Thesis examines the fields of philosophy, developmental psychology, neuropsychology, cognitive theory, semiotics and media theory to explore our human relationship with technology and provide an integrative approach for re-examining our attitudes towards technology.

An investigation into various cultures’ relationships with technological tools as a means of seeking knowledge will reveal how various technological artefacts can be used to amplify cognition and lead us to internalise mental skills, expanding our consciousness. From the loom to the written word we shall see a relationship emerge between human cognition and self-conception and the development of technology.

Investigations in developmental cognitive theory will reveal criticisms of the current developmental model as proposed by Piaget which states there is an end-point to human cognitive development. Examining an alternative developmental theory, we focus on the developmental model as drawn from Vedic psychology and practiced in the technique of Transcendental Meditation (TM). This technique operates as a ‘cultural amplifier’ for cognitive development beyond language based conceptual levels of thought to post-conceptual higher stages of consciousness. Reflecting on the work of Walter Ong and his notion of writing as a technology as consciousness-expanding, we pose the question. Do new media technologies (such as video games, virtual reality and multimedia environments) hold the potentialities to act as a ‘cultural amplifier’ towards cognitive development and what is regarded as higher states of consciousness? A notion such as this blurs traditional lines between the mental and material, cognitive and non cognitive and biology and culture and provides an understanding for re-examining our attitudes and interactions with technology.

Download Paper Here: Media-Technologies-Cognition-and-Consciousness-Expansion.

Discussion on Identity in Community

This article is an investigation into the notion of identity as explored in Information Age Vol.II : The Power of Identity.

This is the second of  three volumes on the ‘Information Age’ by Manual Castells. Follow this link to read the review of the first volume here

Manual Castells – Information Age, Vol II. The Power of Identity:

Identity

The source of meaning and experience as Castells suggests, can be see as a confluence of many flows of constructed and lived experience. We can see the parallels in the construction of self and identity across cultures as lives expressed, lived and experienced.

In Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, it is put aptly that:

We know no people without names, no languages or cultures in which some manner off distinctions between self and other, we and they, are not made…Self-knowledge- always a construction no matter how much it feels like a discovery- is never altogether separable from claims to be known in specific ways by others. Calhoun (1994:9-10).

 What we do, the stories we tell, our identities manifest again through our cultural experiences & participation. From the micro to macro level, personal expressions to cultural institutions or political bodies, all engage in the process of identity formation.

Certain experiences, sets of cultural attributes and their related cultural meanings enact a process of construction of plural meanings and sources for meaning for an individual.

This negotiation, Giddens (1991) argues is a process of Individuation, whereby identity-sources for an individual will have a relative weight in influence and corresponds to the individuals ability to extrapolate meaning through of process of internalisation and constructed meaning.

With a focus on collective identities, Castells stresses what he suggests is The Power of Identity. While institutions with experiences and narrative engage an individual, they are more defined as ‘roles’, their potence of influence or an individual’s level of investment is weak when compared to ‘Identities’, which have a much larger value for an individual to engage meaning.  Indeed we can see the corresponding value negotiation in peoples lives today, such as the role and meaning of the citizen/consumer/worker in negotiation with the identity and meaning of mother/father/carer.

The social construction of identity always takes place in a context marked by power relationships, in negotiation with individuals, looking to engage individuals for investment in various symbolic contexts. Castells (2010: 8-9) proposes a distinction between three forms of identity building.

Legitimizing identity

Present in the established dominant institutions of society. These legitimising identities by their existence extend and continue to rationalize their position through a process of action of social actors.  For Castells it generates a civil society; that is a set of organisations and institutions as well as a series of structures and organised social actors, which reproduce, albeit in a somewhat conflictive manner, the identity that rationalises the sources of structural domination.

Antonio Gramsci’s original conception of civil society has parallels with Castells notion, still the inherent dynamic of the dominant structures (churches, parties, unions & civic associations) employing various apparatuses of identity construction illustrates the continuity between civil societies institutions and the power apparatuses of the state organised around similar identities (citizenship, democracy; the politicisation of social change, the confinement of power to the state and its ramifications) Castells 2010. p.9.

Theorists Gransci, de Tocqueville see democracy and civility, Foucault and Sennet and Horkheimer and Marcuse see internalized domination and legitimation of an over-imposed, undifferentiated, normalising identity.

The vulnerability of power to the continuity of identity between State and society allows for the transition of power, identity and society and consequently their apparatuses. That is, if there is continuity.

Resistance Identities

These identities appear to use a zoological term, subdominant to institutions and major apparatuses of power. Identity of resistance is built for resistance, the rejection of the logic ‘their’ domination; this forms communes and communities of collective resistance. Operating through this resistance for survival on a basis of difference from, or opposed to those permeating the institutions of society. Actors of this resistance identity still have apparatuses for generating symbolic contexts and meaning.

Castells (p.8) dubs it ‘The exclusion of the excluders by the excluded’ and refers this construction to Calhoun (1994. p.17) and the emergence of identity politics.

The defensive identities in opposition to the dominate institution/ideologies reverse their value judgement while reinforcing the reinforcing the boundary. Here there is a blurry line at which Castells points to empirical or historical specific answers about whether this identity is isolationist and fragmentary or it engages within a larger social, power or communicative network. It’s a question of information flow.

Project Identities

Castells points to the example of feminism. As feminism moved from the trenches of a resistance identity, standing for women’s identity and rights towards an overall structural change which challenged patriarchal hegemony and it’s components of production, reproduction, sexuality and personality.

Drawing from Alain Touraine (1995) Castells suggests the project identity, produces subjects. Yet subjects are not individuals, they are the collective social actor through which individuals reach holistic meaning in their experience (Touraine 1992).

The subject of the project identity is building an identity as a project of a different life, towards a transformation of society.  Subjects act, with whatever cultural materials are available, to build a new identity that redefines their position and values in society.

Answers for how these identity projects are constructed, lay in historical and social contexts.

Yet Castells refers to Giddens (1991) notion of identity in ‘late-modernity’ to tie into the transformations in the Network Age. Late-modernity identity in one in which‘self-identity is not a distinctive trait possessed by the individual, It is the self reflexively understood by the person in terms of their biography.” Giddens suggests that in the context of the post –traditional order, the self becomes a reflective project (p.32-55).

One of the distinctive features of modernity is an increasing interconnection between the two extremes of extensionality and intentionality: globalising influences on the one had and personal dispositions on the other…The more traditional loses it hold and the more daily life is reconstituted in terms of dialectical interplay of the local and the global, the more individuals are forced to negotiate lifestyle choices among a diversity of options… Reflexivity organised life planning… becomes a central features of the structuring of self-identity.

In the preface to Castells’ 2010 publication, Information Age Vol III End of Millennium he acknowledges the need for further investigation into the relationship between reactive and proactive social movements. He suggests that understanding the transition from resistance identity to project identity was based on the assumption of implicit assumption that cultural communes and resistance identity come first, followed by a nurturing of projects identity as a second stage.

Acknowledging a tentative hypothesis he suggests that these transformations occur by proposing new cultural codes with the ability to transform society. This in essence defines it as a cultural movement. The key point here is communication; the networks of information (from mass media to mass self-communication) have been labelled as the domain of emergence for this construction.

 

References

Calhoun (1994:9-10) Social Theory and the Politics of Identity . Oxford Blackwell 1994

Giddens, Anthony. 1985. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism:  Vol.II  The Nation State & Violence.

Castells (2010: 8-9)

Castells (2010: 8-9) citing Buci–Glucksman, Christine (1978). Gramsci et l’etat. Paris Grasset.

Touraine (1995) La formation de sujet, in Dubet and Wieorka (eds), pp.21-46.  

Touraine (1992) Critique de  la modernite. Paris. Fayard.

 

Review: The Power of Identity

the-power-of-identity-200x300This is the second of  three volumes on the ‘Information Age’ by Manual Castells. Follow this link to read the review of the first volume here

In this volume Castells brings a keen focus on the social motivations that are embodied in the relationships and community we keep. Across 6 chapters Castells examines the forces behind the structure of various social groups to tease out the transformations that lead to their creation, and continuation.

In the first chapter, of ‘Our World Our Lives’ Castells takes to contruction of identity. In what is an important introduction the author make notes that in this volume the primary focus is on social movement and politics as a result of an interplay between technology-induced globalization, the power of identity (gender, religious, national, ethnic, territorial, socio-biological) and the institutions of the State.

Castell’s defines social movements as being: purposive collective actions whose outcome, in victory as in defeat, transforms the values and institutions of society. He makes note that investigation of sociological movements there is no ‘good’ or ‘bad’ progressive and regressive social movements from an analytical perspective (2010. p.4). This is an important point to make and one to reflect back on when conducting an sociological analysis of any particular group. Engendering any analysis can be inaccurate one, if not dangerous.

For Castells’ in ‘Imagined communities or Communal Images?‘, he highlights the incongruence between some social theory in relation to identity construction and contemporary practice.

Nations and nationalism have a life of their own, independent of statehood yet embedded in cultural constructs and political projects. However attractive the notion of ‘imagined communities’ from Anderson (1983) may be, it is either obvious or empirically inaccurate. Drawing from Gellner (1983), Castells uses this definition of nations as pure ideological artefacts, constructed through arbitrary manipulation of historical myths by intellectuals for the interests of social and economic elites, then the historical record seems to support such an excessive deconstructionism.

The author, in addition suggests that ‘to be sure ethnicity, religion, language, territory per se do not suffice to build nations and induce nationalism’

There are four major points which relate to contemporary nationalism for Castells:

  • Contemporary nationalism may be orientated towards the construction of a sovereign state.
  • Nations are not historically limited to modern incarnations of the state since the French revolution. Avoid Eurocentrism.
  • Nationalism is not an elite phenomenon.
  • Contemporary nationalism is more reactive than proactive it tends to be more cultural than political, and thus already more orientated towards defence of an already institutionalised culture than construction/destruction of a nationalism.

All of these points are important to note when attempting to trace the engagement between identity formation and negotiation of the Nation and the individual or social group.

Castells comes to see this collective identity construction as a fundamental function of the nation-state system but that nations and nationalism has a new significance in the information age

Nations as Castells see it are cultural communes constructed in the people minds and collective memory by the sharing of history and political projects (p.54). Within this it is also Castells hypothesis that language, and particularly a fully developed language, is a fundamental attribute of self-recognition, and of the establishment of an invisible national boundary less arbitrary than territoriality. (p.55)

Castells discussions in the first and second volume of The Information Age trilogy highlight the changing forces that are acting upon our nations, culture, communication and experience.

The space of flows, and timeless time are but two attribute that have shaken up certain primary way of understanding who we (individually and collectively) are. The network state and network identity in all of it’s dominant and subordinate flows fundamentally alter the ‘sharing of history’, ‘language’ and ‘political projects’. Geography and time alone are transcended to enact new conditions for the formation of identity, nationalism, and nation.

As modes of communication change, so to does our notion of shared history and space.

Consequently a mediated and shared communication space can have profound impact upon identity construction.

These ideas, more realised when traced through a specific case study (which is another chapter in its entirity) can help identify the forces at play in the construction and power of identity.

Further References

Gellner, Ernest (1983) Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca. NY Cornell Uni Press

Anderson, Benedict (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London Verso.

Giddens, Anthony. 1985. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: Vol.II The Nation State & Violence.

 

 

Review: The Rise of the Network Society

Manual_Castells_Information_Age_Vol_1In this first of three volumes on the ‘Information Age’, Castells attempts to grasp what clearly is a wide ranging, evolving change surrounding technology, people, labor practices, consumption and economy. While suggesting that in a sense we have always been a society organised by networks and information, he compels the reader to conceive of the drivers of the post-industrial revolution and beyond to the global economy as the embodiment of the Information Society. A series of ever increasing changes in communication technology and technological applications in general has been a conduit for dramatic changes in how we function.

From flex-timers, network enterprises, blurring of life cycles, timeless time, space of flows and a virtualisation (from labor to reality), Castells divulges these changes by conducting a wide ranging examination of global economic changes. He empirically illustrates the emerging (and by the day ever more emergent) social structures of the global economy facilitated by technology.

An encapsulation of the notion of what the information age comprises of is a difficult task, one in which Castells has had to commit over 1,500 pages across three volumes to exposure trade and labor practices and their relationship to socio-technological environments. Citing specific studies he traces economic development (including a segmented breakdown) across advanced economies and emergent economies from the post world war two era.

Castells sees the transformations of trade markets primarily from national or localised to the global and inter-connected. Including and beyond the traditional resources trading of oil, minerals, gas and weapons, we see financial, manufacturing, agricultural and services under-go fundamental reorganisations.

An examination and comparision on the national level illustrates a stratification, or separation of modes of production. One general trend, that many cite as the implication of globalisation, the loss of jobs to offshore and the degrading of the nations economic prosperities, in part reflect a reality, but not the whole picture.

While human labor production is being integrated and distributed into global system in an effort to avoid labour costs, streamline larger productions networks. Where there is a lack of employment opportunities in certain production industries (primarily human labor) Castells illustrates there is corresponding growth in other production sectors. The inverse trend is that in ‘high technology’ producer states experience a surge in information production, management sectors.

The example of the United States financial industry sector or as the Burero of Labor Statistics defines it as ‘Producer Services’ (which includes Banking, Insurance, Real Estate, Engineering, Accounting & Legal Services) can be show to have experienced the highest level of growth relative to all other sectors accept Social Services from the period stretching from 1920 to 1991.

Castells (2006) Table 4.1 United States: Percentage distribution of employment by industrial sector and intermediate industry group. p.304

This confluence of many factors still, does illustrate the changing dynamic and the multivalent make-up that is the globally networked information society.

What informs these transformations is the development of communication technologies and the underlying applications of technology. All within a social political framework, there are flows of production and consumption battling for a supreme network position, to be key in production of flows in order to secure future production flows, wealth and security.

The conglomerate of interactions, influences and connections between the mix of labor, society, economy and technology can be seen to embody these changes that

Castells sees as facilitated by technology. And this can be hard to deny.

Far be it to argue for technological determinism or question individual freedom of use, what Castells is concerned with the ‘Network Logic’, a disposition of assemblages between embedded amongst our global system, a techno-socio-economic information production network.

Castells does not argue to define a static arrangement of the engagement between various institutions and modes of distribution but to illustrate and trace the forces at play intersecting across the multiple spheres of production, power and distribution.

A mix of social analysis and evidence from key global economic developments Castells provides a strong base for further incursions into what the network is comprised of, and what it could be.

With two more volume there’s plenty to discuss.

Disruptive Technology

What exactly is Disruptive?

As new arrangements of technological systems interface with our human and social world, does the descriptive disruptive practically provide a term to assist society to conceptualise these new transformative potentials?

Defined as, to rupture, throw into disorder and disrupt the normal course of unity, its first known use is in 1793(Merriam-Webster). It took another hundred years or so for disruption to find a place in late 19th century physics.

More recently in the 1960’s ‘Disruptive Selection’ also known as ‘diversifying selection’ became used in population genetics a part of evolutionary theory. As such ‘diversifying selection’ is regarded to be the central component to sympatric speciation (Smith, 1966), the process in which new species evolve from a single ancestral species within the same area.

The term ‘Disruptive’ was paired with ‘technology’ by Clayton Christensen in 1995, professor of business administration at the Harvard Business School. Disruptive Innovation emerged as an area of focus in theories of industrial innovation to seek to understand what milieu of specific industries, products, technologies and market environments foster innovative practises.

With the focus upon innovation and retaining productivity within an economic market Christensen notes that disruption can be operating across multiple axes. As a subset of market ‘sustaining innovation’, ‘revolutionary innovation’ or ‘discontinuous innovation’ is characterised as not affecting the existing market, the classic example illustrated here is the automobile.

It was not until the Ford Model T in 1908 which became cheap enough through mass production transformed the car from a luxury item into a disruptive innovation across the transportation market. Indeed it was not the technology of the automobile that singularly defined the disruption of the horse and cart. Rather its was Fordism, the mass production line and petroleum extraction and delivery technologies in a milieu of other socio-economic factors, which enabled the automobiles disruption (Christensen, 1997, 2003 p.43-48).

This analysis maps innovation on an axis between market performances against the non-consumption disruption. This discontinuous innovation, fails to highlight the other vast number of potential exchanges and disruptions that may emerge from the innovation, until there is an impedance or opportunity upon ‘markets’ the analysis is not there. Indeed there exists social, cultural, psychological and agency exchanges which are not included in disruptions conception.

Disruptive innovation as an externality of a sustaining market creates a new market which applies a new of operational rules which govern its interaction. This new market eventuates in the overtaking of existing markets.

These analyses of Christensen are in themselves market sustaining innovations, in which attempts to explore the disruptive engagement. The relationship between technological artefacts and users are looked over in favour of higher level ‘market potential’ of revolutionary-sustaining innovation.

From the history of it’s usage, the term ‘disruptive’ occupies a place of change and transformation. This change can be seen as a rearrangement, a reorganisation, as change occurs it exhibits behaviour of a networked character. Duncan Watts identifies flows and cascades of changes across the network as they exhibit predictable change observable across networks. These externalities exhibit influence across its network altering its components ‘behaviour’ or methods of exchange and production.

For Watts the science of determining predictability and thresholds for change is in the nature of the relationship of the network’s parts. While Network theory is susceptible to over simplification, the base observable mathematical relationships between unit and whole describes the point at which change occurs through a system of influence of relationships or ‘network logic’.

To map the potential for change means to understand considerations of individual parts and sum of the parts into the whole. Such considerations are externalities that is, factors that engage with individual network parts to influence change. The many relationships the part has within, exists secondary and tertiary externalities almost ad infinitum.

Watts provides the example of Fax machine proliferation. For this, externalities exist from the fact that fax machine consumption and use requires people to want to talk with each other (Watts 2004, p.220 – 243). As with Christensen’s automobile, the externality of affordability for consumer and producer is dependent upon the efficient resource and capital supply to producers, manufacturers and consumer markets. Additionally, there exists the externality of human desire to travel faster than the existing modes of transport, and many more.

Our concern about disruptions can be understood as the potential for change, the arrangement of network parts in which change occurs. From the externality of a single part to revolutionary- sustaining innovation across the network, a chain of influencing externalities may result to create a cascading or overarching change in the dominant network logic.

The Information Bomb

Paul Virilio – The Information Bomb, this book is amazing, full of great insight on where we have been and perhaps where we are headed. Instead of discussing some particular theme, here are some of the more interesting ideas from this book which was published 1997.

The Information Bomb

9781844670598-frontcover-212x300

Civilisation or the militarization of science? This is the first question posed in Virilio’s information bomb.

Science has developed solely with a view to the pursuit of limit-performances.

Modern science has become progressively become techno-science.

Fatal confusion between operation instruments and exploratory research.

p.1

The decline of the analogue mental process, in favour of instrumental digital procedures, which are capable, we are told of boosting knowledge.

Operational Reality of a technological instrument.

And

Resolutory truth of scientific thought.

Fused without notice.

p.2

Talking about the convergence / emergence of extreme science – analogous with extreme sports.

p.3

Only a few centuries ago the science of appearance of a relative truth, techno-science is once again become a science of the disappeared of the same truth with the coming of a knowledge which is not so encyclopaedic as cybernetic, a knowledge which denies all objective reality.

The after largely contributing to the speeding up of the world by various means for the representation of the world, with optics, electro-optics and even recent establishments of the space of virtual reality, contemporary science are engaging, a contrario in eclipsing of real in the aesthetics of scientific disappearance.

The science of verisimilitude of the plausible, still attached. (the appearance of the real).

Discovery of relative truth or a science of implausibility. – committed to heightened virtual reality.

comm. Distance . time lags,

The emergence of a META geography.

In part from the production of telecontinents.

p.10

Pentagon geostrategic view of turning the globe inside out like a glove. For American military leaders, the global is the interior of finite world whose very finitude poses many logistical problems. And he local is exterior, the periphery if not indeed the outer suburbs of the world.

Globitarian transformation – transformation which extraverts localness, all localness. … now does not deport persons. But deports their living space, the space where they subsist economically.

Not merely of national but also social identity.

For the first time bill Clinton declared ‘there is no longer any distinction between domestic and foreign policy’ .

The real city was situated in a precise place which gives its name to the politics of nations, is giving way to virtual city that de-territorialised meta-city which is hence the site of that metro politics, the totalitarian or rather globaritarian character of which will be plain for all to see’

p.11

Centre is everywhere and whose circumference nowhere – pascal.

p.12

Time and space dilation.

More interval are being abolished the more the image of space dilates.

The coming of the live, of direct transmission bought about by turning the limit-speed of waves to effect, transforms the old tele-vision into a planetary grand-scale optics.

With CNN and its various offshoots, domestic television has given way to tele-surveilance.

The sudden focusing –a security orientated phenomenon of the media monitoring of the life of nations – heralds the dawn of a particular form of the day, which totally escapes the diurnal-nocturnal alternation that previous structured history.

p.13

 False day – artificial time, sun.

Audio visual contiguity progressively taking over from the territorial contiguity of nations which has now decline in importance, the political frontier were themselves to shift from the real space of geopolitics to the real time of the chorno-politics of the transmission of images and sounds.

Two complimentary aspects of globalism:

Extreme reduction of distances which ensures from the temporal compression of transport and transmissions;

On the other

The current general spread of tele-surveilannce, delivering a world that is constantly tele-present.

p. 14

Substitute horizons. – Artificial horizons.

Stereo-reality

Reality of immediate appearances > virtual reality media trans-appearances

Impression of reality.

p.15

This new reality effect

Technologies of synthetic vision;

p.16

Here there computer is no longer simple a devise for consulting information sources but an automation vision machine operating within the space of an entirely virtual geographical reality.

Universal voyeurism.

p.29

As a century of unbound curiosity, covetous looking and the deregulation of the gaze, the 20th century has not been the century of the image, as is often claimed but of optics – and in particular of the optical illusion

Since pre-1914 , the imperative of propaganda and subsequently during the long period of the cold war and nuclear deterrence, security and intelligence needs have gradually drawn us into an intolerable situation in which industrial optics have run wildly out of control.

‘panoply of orbital satellites’

‘the cinema involves putting the eye into a military uniform’ Kafka (Gustav, Janouch, conversations with kafka; trans goronmy ree, andre deutsch , London, 1968.

p.160

what are we to say then , of this dictatorship exerted more than half a century ago by optical hardware which has become omniscient and omnipresent and which , like any totalitarian regime, encourages us to forget we are individual beings?

p.37 – 38

The Gutenberg galaxy mass-produced populations of deaf-mutes. … industrial typography by spreading the habit of solitary – and hence silent – reading, was to gradually deprive the people of that use of speech and hearing which had previously been involved in the (public, polyphonic) reading aloud made necessary by the relative scarcity of manuscripts.

Printing forces a degree of impoverishment upon language, which not only lost its social relief (primorial eloquence) but also its spatial relief (it emphases, is prosody).

If we go drawing up a list of the sensory deprivations we owe to the technological and industrial wastage of our perceptual capacities, we can cite, according to preference, the consenting victims of electricity, those of the photographic snapshot and those of the optical illusion of cinema – these various items of representational equipment which have swelled the ranks of the partially sighted and of those whom Walter Benjamin dubbed the image illiterates.

Jean Rostand reckoned that radio ‘had not perhaps made us more foolish, but that it had made foolishness noisier’

p.39

without event suspecting it, we have become the heirs and descendants of some fearsome antecedents, the prisoners of hereditary defects transmitted now not through the genes, sperm or blood, but through an unutterable technical contamination.

 Dogmatism of the totalitarian techno-cult.

p.60

Since the ‘globalisation of the single market’ demands overexposure of every activity; it requires the simultaneous creation of competition between companies, societies and even consumers themselves, which now mean individual , not simple certain categories of ‘target populations’.

Hense the sudden intimely emergency of a universal comparative advertising which has relatively little to do with publicizing a brand or consumer product of some kind, since the aim is now , through the commerce of the visible, to inaugurate a genuine visible market.

After the direct lighting of cities by the magic of electricity in the twentieth century, the companies created by these mergers are pioneering and indirect lighting of the world for the twenty-first century.

A new-optics, capable of helping a panoptical vision to appear, a vision which is indispensable if the ‘market of the visible’ is the be established.

p.63

After the first bomb, the atom bomb, which was capable of using the energy of radioactivity to smash matter, the spectre of a second bomb is looming at the end of this millennium. This is the information bomb, capable of using interactivity of information to wreak the peace between nations.

p.65

Progress towards optical snooping

The globalization of the gaze of a single eye

p.67

The smaller the world becomes as a result of the relativistic effect of telecommunication, the more violently situations are concertinaed, with the risk of an economic and social crash that would merely be the extension of the visual crash of this market of the visible in which the virtual bubble of the interconnected financial markets is never any other than the inevitable consequence of that visual bubble of a politics which has become both panoptical and cybernetic.

p.71

 From the first television link-up.

The world made the sudden transition from the hear-it-now to the overexposure of ‘see-it-now’. From now on whether we like it or not, any interpersonal relationship, any entry into communication, any cognitive procedure involves us unconsciously in that unsanctioned violence of an ‘optical shock’ which has become global.

p.75

The great audio-visual dilemma, the conflict between the soft (the world) and the hard( the image).

politics – politicians – the language – media use

… a new state of consciousness which the instantaneous violence of universal communication at every second implies.

p.76

Tthe talk of gathering together and drawing closer together now gives way to a language which banished , rejects ,excludes an divides.

Such a backlash and such repercussions are contained by definition within the technologies of acceleration. And terrorism and advertising have long built their doctrine on such media violence.

p.86.

conjuror – heaven gate – illusion –belief in the nonexistent

p.94

The general tendencies of the market and of mass production were to be gravely affected by this and we were to pass inexplicable from the industrial to the post-industrial age, from the real to the virtual, this fulfilling hopes of a resolutely immature society.

To prefer the illusions of networks drawing on the absolute speed of electronic impulses, which give, or claim to give instantaneously what time accords only gradually.

It means making the future no long er appear to exist by having it happen now .

p.107-8

The techno-scopic illusion, is a techno-system of strategic communications which brings with it a the systemic risk of a chain reaction of damage as soon as globalisation has become effective.

The information bomb which has just exploded will very soon require the establishment of a new type of deterrence – in this case a societal one, with automated circuit breakers put in place capable of avoiding the over-heating, if not indeed the fission of the social core of nations

The revolution of real information is also a revolution in virtual disinformation and hence in history as currently being written.

Radioactivity of the elements matter, interactivity of the constituents of information – the harm done by irradiation is discreet and multifarious, at time amounting to general contamination.

The actor and tele-actors of the cybernetic telecommunications revolution, acting and interacting in real time set a technical pace or tempo which now lords it over the properly historical importance of the local time of societies and countries. .

This works exclusively to the advantage of a world time which no longer belongs so much to the history of nationals as to the abstraction of a universal chrono-politics for which no political representative is truly responsible, except for in certain military general staffs in the case of cyberwar being declared.

 Information Bomb is available online and in hardcopy.